Appellate Practice Clinic Wins Case in the Eighth District Court of Appeals

The first cohort of online JD students to take the Appellate Practice Clinic prevailed on their first case before the Eighth District Court of Appeals. JDO students Taylor Bush, Madeline Clark, and Meghan Norcross all worked on the case, under the supervision of Professor Doron Kalir.

The facts of the case were as follows: In a Small Claims Court , Mr. H sued Mr. D for a faulty repair job on his car. Both parties received 40-day notice prior to the hearing. On the eve of the hearing, just hours before it was set to begin, Mr. D sent a short, hand-written request to the Court asking to delay the hearing by more than 100 days. The Magistrate denied the motion, and proceeded with the hearing the next day. Mr. D did not appear, so, Mr. H. – who appeared pro-se – prevailed on the merits and won some $5,000 judgment in his favor.

Mr. D then “lawyered up,” and timely filed objections to the magistrate’s decision with the common pleas court judge. The judge rejected those objections and affirmed the magistrate’s decision. Mr. H — through his lawyer — timely appealed to the Eighth District Court of Appeals. 

That’s where the Appellate Clinic sprung into action. The Clinic contacted Mr. D, who until then appeared pro-se, and offered to help him on his appeal. He happily agreed. 

The three students began by carefully reviewing the record below. They then focused on the issues at hand – which included the law of motions for continuance, the relevant standard of review, and the special nature of a small-claims proceedings – and conducted thorough legal research on each. Then each student was tasked with writing a separate section of the Brief. 

Later in the Semester, each student practiced conducting Oral Argument on that case. (The actual case was decided without oral argument.) 

On April 23, 2026, the Eighth District Court of Appeals released its Opinion, affirming the decision below. In essence, the Court accepted nearly all of the Clinic’s arguments in favor of its client and denied all claims to the contrary.

The client was truly satisfied. In his brief “Thank You” note, he thanked the students “so much for all the hard work” they completed. He further noted that “what you guys do is amazing and I’m sure there are many others who really appreciate your hard work.”

Professor Doron Kalir, the Appellate Practice Clinic Director, supervised the work and served as Counsel of Record.

Professor Sterio Comments on ICC Prosecutor Alleged Misconduct

Professor Milena Sterio was quoted in a JusticeInfo article entitled “How Khan’s Investigation Mess Creates Factions.” She commented on the ongoing investigation into alleged misconduct of ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan.

Professor Sterio was one of four main drafters of the recently issued statement by the American Branch of the International Law Association ICC Committee, which had criticized procedural irregularities regarding the ongoing investigation into Khan’s alleged misconduct.

Professor Sterio Quoted by PolitiFact

Professor Milena Sterio was quoted in an article by PolitFact on April 2, on the topic of “It is a war crime to bomb civilian infrastructure, as Donald Trump has threatened?” 

Professor Sterio explained that bombing a civilian target intentionally is “a flagrant violation of international humanitarian law,” which “would give rise to a war crime.”  Professor Sterio also opined on the status of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions.  She stated that the Protocol has “the status of customary law, which is binding on all states,” and that “[i]t doesn’t not matter that the U.S. is not a member of the protocol.”

Professor Sterio Participates in Radio Show on President Trump’s Board of Peace

Professor Sterio participated in another episode of the “Talking Foreign Policy” radio show, a quarterly show broadcast on Ideastream (Cleveland-area NPR affiliate radio station) on the topic of “Assessing Trump’s Board of Peace in the wake of US-Iran war.”  The episode was broadcast live on March 24, and it is available for on-demand listening here.

In addition to Professor Sterio, other experts on this show included Professor Michael Scharf as host (CWRU School of Law), Harold Hongju Koh (Yale Law School), Leila Sadat (Washington University School of Law), and Jessica Peake (UCLA School of Law).  The experts discussed President Trump’s creation of the Board of Peace, the Board’s mandate, and its legitimacy in light of the existing United Nations-based international legal order.  

Professor Sterio Interviewed on Air Talk Radio Show

Professor Milena Sterio was interviewed live on the Air Talk radio program (Los Angeles NPR Station) on March 2, on the legality of the U.S. and Israeli strikes against Iran under international law.  The program, including Prof. Sterio’s interview, is available here.

Witmer-Rich Comments on Police Use of Facial Recognition

Professor Jonathan Witmer-Rich was quoted in an article titled, “Cleveland police use facial recognition without training or transparency on its use,” published by Ideastream Public Media. The article discusses a recent criminal case in which Cleveland police used facial recognition technology to obtain a search warrant in a murder investigation.

In recent public comments to City Council, Cleveland Public Safety Director Wayne Drummond stated that the Cleveland Real Time Crime Center does not use facial recognition technology. However, the recent criminal case shows that the Real Time Crime Center sent images to the Northeast Ohio Fusion Center, which conducted the facial recognition search on their behalf.

Professor Witmer-Rich opined that Cleveland police should be more open about what technology they’re using and how they’re using it.

“What body of images do we want the police to be using if, if using it at all?” Witmer-Rich said. “And is it anything that a company can scrape off of the internet, or should it be something more limited than that? Something that’s limited to a certain set of images that we know are reliable or that we know haven’t been manipulated?”

Professor Hoffman Featured in News Story on Road Construction Impact on Local Businesses

Professor Deborah Hoffman, Visiting Assistant Professor of Law at Cleveland State University College of Law, was featured in a news segment by WEWS News 5 Cleveland addressing legal issues related to prolonged road construction and its impact on local businesses.

The story focuses on a Geneva, Ohio business affected by extended infrastructure work. Professor Hoffman provided commentary on legal considerations involving business access, notice, and the limits of government authority.

The segment includes both a written article and video interview and is available here.

Professor Sterio Participates in Legal Face-Off Radio Program

Professor Milena Sterio participated in an episode of the Legal Face-Off Radio Program on Chicago’s WGN station.  In this episode, Professor Sterio was interviewed regarding the legality of U.S. action in Venezuela, including the kidnapping of Venezuela’s President Maduro, as well as the prosecution of Maduro and his wife in the Southern District of New York.  The episode is available on the WGN Radio website, as well as on various social media: 

Professor Sterio concluded that the U.S. actions in Venezuela were illegal under international law as they violated the U.N. Charter as well as corresponding customary law, which bans states from using force against each other.  Professor Sterio also opined that the U.S. prosecution of Maduro in the Southern District of New York will most likely proceed.  She explained that U.S. federal district court judges tend to defer to the executive branch on matters implicating foreign relations and national security. Moreover, there is Supreme Court precedent confirming that a forcibly kidnapped defendant can nonetheless be prosecuted in U.S. court, and precedent from the 1989-90 Panama situation, where the leader of Panama, General Noriega, was prosecuted by U.S. court despite his claims of sovereign immunity.  Last, Professor Sterio discussed legal issues surrounding the enforcement of arrest warrants extra-territorially; she concluded that jurisdiction to enforce is purely territorial under international law and that the U.S. violated international law when it arrested Maduro in Venezuela.  

Professor Sterio Interviewed Regarding Venezuela and Lindsay’s Halligan’s Appointment 

Professor Milena Sterio appeared on a segment of Bloomberg News live on January 7.  She discussed the legality of the U.S. attacks against Venezuela and the related kidnapping of Nicolas Maduro.  She also focused on legal issues surrounding Maduro’s now ongoing prosecution in the Southern District of New York. 

Professor Sterio also appeared on Fox News – DC on January 7, in a live news segment, where she discussed the recent decision by a federal district judge to request that Lindsay Halligan explain how and why she keeps acting as U.S. Attorney, in light of a November 2025 ruling by a different federal judge, who had ruled that she had been improperly appointed.  

Professor Sterio Comments in Media on US Attack on Venezuela

Professor Milena Sterio has been quoted in the media extensively regarding the United States’ attack against Venezuela on Jan. 3.  Professor Sterio was quoted in a Reuters article titled “Legality of US capture of Venezuela’s Maduro in focus at United Nations.”

She was also interviewed by Fox 5 (DC) on January 3, where she offered live commentary following President Trump’s Press Conference. In addition, she was interviewed on the Air Talk radio show (Los Angeles NPR station) on January 5; the episode is available for on-demand listening here.

Finally, she was quoted in a BBC article (“Trump’s seizure of Maduro raises thorny legal questions, in US and abroad“) on January 5.