Professor Milena Sterio ranks 39th in the United States in Scholarly Impact Rankings for International Law scholars, according to Hein Online. Hein Online publishes a list of top 100 scholars by subject area, and Professor Sterio is listed in the International Law Impact Rankings. The impact rankings are based on the number of citations, as well as additional factors.
Professor Milena Sterio participated as an expert in a week-long training of Ukrainian judges and prosecutors on International Humanitarian Law, War Crimes Prosecutions, and International Environmental Law, from January 19-23, in Rzeszów, Poland.
The training was organized by the International Bar Association, and the expert team, in addition to Professor Sterio, consisted of professors and practitioners from the United Kingdom, Brazil, Chile, and the United States. Professor Sterio delivered two presentations about the sources of International Humanitarian Law and the fundamental principles of International Humanitarian Law. In addition, she also led several discussion groups and simulated exercises, where she guided Ukrainian colleagues across various evidentiary challenges as they relate to complex war crimes trials. This was Professor Sterio’s second trip to Poland as an expert; she had previously participated in a similar training in September 2024.
Professor Deborah Hoffman, Visiting Assistant Professor of Law at CSU Law, has published an article titled “Digital Assets and Estate Planning: Preventing and Resolving Trust and Probate Challenges,” co-authored with Wesley Brandi, CTO of Praefortis. The article appears in the January/February 2026 issue of ABA Probate & Property, a publication of the American Bar Association’s Real Property, Trust and Estate Law Section.
The article addresses the growing intersection of digital assets and traditional estate planning, as cryptocurrencies, NFTs, and other blockchain-based holdings become increasingly common in trusts and probate proceedings. It explores the unique challenges these assets present, including inventory and documentation gaps, access issues involving private keys and recovery phrases, and limitations fiduciaries may face under federal and state law.
The article also speaks to practical strategies for estate planners and fiduciaries, including drafting trust provisions that authorize access and management of digital assets, planning for secure custody and recovery, and anticipating disputes that may arise when assets are missing, inaccessible, or alleged to be misappropriated. It is aimed at trusts and estates attorneys, fiduciaries, and litigators navigating the legal and technical realities of digital wealth.
Professor Sterio presented on six different panels at the AALS Annual Meeting in New Orleans.
On January 6, she spoke on a Hot Topics panel entitled “Ukrainian Resilience on the Front Lines of Democracy: What is the Role of International Law?. On January 7, she spoke on a panel entitled “Declaring a Climate Emergency,” where she focused on the recent rulings by international and regional courts establishing that there is a human right to live in a healthy environment.
Also on January 7, Professor Sterio spoke on a late-breaking panel, which she also organized, on “Maduro’s Capture and the Venezuelan Incursion: Untying the Legal Knots?” On January 8, she presented at two teaching/pedagogy panels, on the topics of “Teaching Human Rights: From Specialized Courses to Doctrinal Integration” and “Teaching International Law & Intergroup Dialogue in Challenging Times” (Professor Sterio organized the latter panel as well). Finally, also on January 8, Professor Sterio provided comments to a junior scholar on a panel entitled “New Voices in International Human Rights and International Law.”
Professor Sterio was also elected Treasurer of the International Law Section; she continues to serve on the Executive Committees of the International Human Rights Law and the National Security Law Sections, where she is past chair.
Professor Deborah Hoffman, Visiting Assistant Professor of Law at CSU Law, has published an article titled “Locked Out at Closing: When Crypto Fails at the Closing Table,” co-authored with Wesley Brandi, CTO of Praefortis. The article is published in ACC Docket, the publication of the Association of Corporate Counsel.
The article addresses the increasing use of cryptocurrency in commercial and real estate transactions and the legal issues that can arise when digital assets are part of a closing. It examines problems such as custody failures, frozen wallets, lost private keys, and disruptions involving third-party platforms, each of which can delay or prevent a transaction from closing.
The article focuses on how these issues fit within existing real estate and transactional law frameworks and discusses the role of counsel in addressing them through diligence, deal structure, and contract drafting. It is aimed at in-house counsel and transactional attorneys advising clients where digital assets are involved.
On December 17, Professor Kalir published an op-ed on Cleveland.com titled, “Texas redistricting case highlights growing judicial rift.” In the op-ed, Professor Kalir reviewed the recent Supreme Court “shadow docket” opinion in the Texas redistricting case. In that case, the Court reversed a 160-page opinion by the lower court with a short statement, without oral argument and without any real reasoning. In dissent, Justice Kagan highlighted the paradox of overruling such a thorough work product with a cursory review “over a holiday weekend.” Professor Kalir, following a New York Times survey among lower-court judges, argued that this opinion is a harbinger of a growing rift between the “one Supreme Court” and “other inferior courts” that the Constitution had invested with the “judicial power” of the United States.
On February 4-5, Seton Hall Law School will host its first-ever “Faith, Values, and the Rule of Law: An Interdisciplinary Conference.” The conference will examine “how the world’s greatest religious, theological, and philosophical traditions have all contributed to the understanding of justice and human dignity that underscore modern rule of law principles,” bringing together “scholars in law, theology, religious studies, philosophy, political science, international affairs, history, literature, ethics, and related disciplines.”
Professor Kalir’s paper, “Jewish Human Dignity: Equality Before God & Men,” was selected for presentation at the Conference. The paper traces the notion of “K’vod Ha’Adam” – human dignity – in the Jewish bible as one of the main origins of the modern notion of equality. It further claims that understanding equality in such terms should trigger a rebuttable presumption of “leveling up” of equality-violation remedies, an issue that has long been portrayed as “one of the most vexing issues of constitutional equality.”
Christa Laser published the essay Ten Tips for Legal Empiricists in the Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property. The essay, co-edited by Professor Laser and Professor Jordana Goodman, includes contributions from a range of leading empirical scholars on advice for empirical legal research.
In addition to Professor Laser and Professor Goodman, contributors to the essay include Mark Lemley, Lisa Larrimore Ouellette, Michael Frakes, Melissa Wasserman, Saurabh Vishnubhakat, Janet Frelich, Jennica Silbey, David Schwartz, and Neel Sukhatme.
The citation is Jordana Goodman and Christa Laser, Tep Tips for Legal Empericists, 23 N.W. J. Tech. & Intell. Prop. 227 (2025),
Professor Milena Sterio presented at a book roundtable at Temple University’s Beasley School of Law on December 11 in Philadelphia. The book roundtable centered around Professor Harold Hongju Koh’s new book, The National Security Constitution in the 21st Century. Professor Koh, Yale Law School, is former Legal Advisor to the U.S. State Department and one of the most prominent scholars of international law worldwide.
Professor Sterio’s remarks, on the topic of “Koh’s Mirror Approach as Restraint on Presidential Power in Matters of National Security,” focused on Professor Koh’s proposal, as described in his book, to require the same degree of congressional involvement when it comes to treaty withdrawal or exit as was required for joining the same treaty. Professor Sterio’s remarks will be published in the form of a law review article by the Temple Journal of International and Comparative Law in 2026.
Professor Milena Sterio participated in the International Criminal Court’s Assembly of States Parties in The Hague, Netherlands, from December 1-5. Professor Sterio participated as a delegate of the Public International Law and Policy Group, a Washington D.C.-based NGO (the ICC’s Assembly of States Parties is open to states and their delegates, as well as accredited NGO delegates).
During the Assembly, Professor Sterio presented on a panel on the topic of “Practical Measures to Protect the International Criminal Court.” Her remarks focused on the recent U.S. sanctions against three prosecutors as well as six judges at the ICC.
Professor Sterio (top center) with other members of the Crimes Against Humanity Study Group at the American Branch of the International Law Association.
CSU Law Faculty 