Category Archives: Faculty in the Media

Sundahl Presents CLE Webinar on Legal Aspects of Space Tourism

Posted on by
On February 20th, C|M|LAW Associate Dean Mark Sundahl moderated a CLE webinar through the West LegalEdcenter entitled Space Tourism: What Lawyers Need to Know to Service this New Industry. Dean Sundahl spoke on the application of export controls to the operations of Virgin Galactic and other suborbital space tourism operators that will start flying their first passengers into space later this year. The webinar also feature Laura Montgomery of the FAA’s Office of the General Counsel and Milton “Skip” Smith, former Chief of Space Law at the Pentagon’s Air Force Headquarters.

 

Forte Completes Southern California Lecture Tour

Posted on by
Professor David Forte

Professor David Forte

C|M|LAW Professor David Forte has returned from a February lecture tour in Southern California.  He presented several lectures over a 4-day period.

On February 4, Professor Forte spoke at Chapman Law School on the topic, “Prospects for Islamic Democracy.” He discussed both the ideological as well as cultural, economic, and juridical impediments to democracy adhering in the Arab Middle East. Professor Clarissa Cianciarullo of Chapman Law School offered commentary and question.
On February 5, he spoke at the University of California at Irvine Law School, and on February 6 at the University of Southern California Law School, on “Chief Justice Roberts’ New Federalism.” The thesis is that Chief Justice Roberts is taking up Chief Justice Rehnquist’s attempt to create a constitutional safe harbor for the states where the sovereign governing authority of the states will be free from federal regulatory authority in certain areas. At USC, Forte was joined by Professor Jeorg W. Knipprath of Southwestern Law School who offered commentary.
Also on February 5, Forte lectured to a graduate seminar in political science at the Claremont-McKenna Graduate School in Claremont, California on “The Response of Catholicism and Islam to Liberal Democracy.” He discussed how two religions, each claiming to be “the one true religion,” contend with the pluralistic and individualistic nature of liberal democracy.
Lastly, on February 7, Professor  spoke to a meeting of the Orange County Lawyers Chapter of the Federalist Society on “Religious Liberty: A Traveloque.” In that talk I discussed the historical sources that coalesced to give the United States its conception of the right of religious liberty.

Forte Joins Amicus Brief on NLRB Recess Appointments

Posted on by
C|M|LAW Professor David Forte joined an amicus brief submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court in NLRB v. Noel Canning.  The case is the appeal from the D.C. Circuit striking down President Obama’s recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board.  The amici argue that the recess appointments clause of the Constitution only permits the President to make appointments during genuine adjournments, or intersessions, of the Congress, and that presidents in recent decades have exceeded their authority in making recess appointments during short intersession recesses.

Mika Edits Articles for ABA International Law Section Publication

Posted on by

C|M|LAW Legal Writing Professor Karin Mika was appointed a Deputy Editor for the ABA Section of International Law’s “Year in Review.”   The Year in Review is the summer issue of “The International Lawyer,” the quarterly journal of the ABA’s International Law Section. 

Sundahl Appointed Chair of FAA International Space Policy Working Group

Posted on by

C|M|LAW Associate Dean Mark Sundahl has been appointed the Chair of the International Space Policy Working Group (ISPWG) of the FAA’s Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee.  The ISPWG will monitor international developments in the regulatory landscape of commercial spaceflight and provide recommendations to the FAA to help ensure the continued international competitiveness of the U.S. space industry.

O’Neill Comments on California Decision Upholding the State’s Ban on Psychiatric Counseling to Dissuade Homosexual Conduct

Posted on by
Professor Kevin F. O'Neill

Professor Kevin F. O’Neill

C|M|LAW Professor Kevin O’Neill was quoted at length in an article,1st Amendment at issue in ban on gay-conversion therapy for minors, by David L. Hudson Jr., in
the January 2014 issue of the ABA Journal, on page 18.   The article deals with a recent Ninth Circuit decision upholding a California statute that bans a type of psychiatric therapy designed to dissuade gay and lesbian minors from homosexual conduct.  Professor O’Neill was asked to comment on the court’s First Amendment analysis.

According to O’Neill, “[p]laying the old ‘conduct-not-speech’ card is something that judges do when faced with particularly thorny speech issues . . .” He adds, “I don’t find it persuasive here, but it gave the 9th Circuit a convenient basis for applying rational-basis review.”

O’Neill says “[t]he statute singles out a particularly ludicrous treatment—a ‘medical’ treatment that is grounded upon ignorance and hostility toward gays and lesbians—and simply bans it. but the ugliness of the treatment doesn’t provide a constitutional basis for banning it.”

O’Neill notes that the Supreme Court invalidated “efforts to ban some of the ugliest speech ever” in the prohibition of images of animal cruelty in U.S. v. Stevens (2010) and violent video games in Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association (2011).

“If you’re going to uphold this statute, you have to focus on the government’s legitimate power to protect children from medical quackery,” O’Neill says. “But that doesn’t fit too easily into any of the unprotected categories of speech, such as obscenity, child porn, true threats or advocacy of imminent lawless action. The absence of clear guidance in First Amendment law may be a strong reason for granting cert in this case.”

Here is a link to the article:

http://www.abajournal.com/magazine/article/1st_amendment_at_issue_in_ban_on_gay-conversion_therapy_for_minors/

Professor O’Neill’s comments appear toward the end of the article, in a section entitled, “Beyond Ugliness.”

 

 

Engel Notes that Cleveland was Ahead of its Time on Subprime Lawsuits

Posted on by

Former C|M|LAW Professor Kathleen Engel published an Opinion piece in the Plain Dealer on December 23, 2013.  In the piece, Cleveland ahead of its time on subprime lawsuits, Engel notes that “Cleveland was the one of the first cities to cry foul when subprime lenders targeted people with complex and unaffordable loan products.” She explains that although Cleveland’s early efforts against the banks’ practices were ahead of their time and ultimately unsuccessful, they lit the way for those that followed.

To read Professor Engel’s piece, click here:

http://www.cleveland.com/opinion/index.ssf/2013/12/cleveland_ahead_of_its_time_in.html

Plecnik to Serve as Willoughby Hills Council Representative to the Willoughby Hills Income Tax Board of Review

Posted on by

On Monday, January 6, 2014, the Willoughby Hills City Council held its organizational meeting for calendar years 2014 and 2015.  During that meeting, Council unanimously voted to elect C|M|LAW Professor John Plecnik the Council Representative to the Willoughby Hills Income Tax Board of Review, a three member body which consists of the Council Representative, City Law Director, and City Finance Director.  The Income Tax Board of Review is tasked with approving local income tax regulations as well as hearing and deciding taxpayer appeals.

Daiker-Middaugh Praises Jack Liber’s Kindness, Generosity and Work on CMBA’s Education Initiative

Posted on by

In an article in the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association’s Bar Journal, C|M|LAW Clinical Professor Pamela Daiker-Middaugh is quoted in a tribute to Jack Liber.  Liber was known for the hard work and energy he devoted to the launch of the CMBA’s Education Initiative, which led to the launch of the Street Law program, the Cleveland Mock Trial Competition, and scholarships to summer civics programs.  According to Daiker-Middaugh, not only was he “a gifted lawyer, . . . in all the years I knew him, I never heard him say an unkind word about anyone.”  Daiker-Middaugh praised his work on law-related education in city classrooms and said that his “legacy lives on in  . . . all the children helped by these wonderful education programs.”

Sagers’ Work on Federal Statute Names Featured in New York Times

Posted on by

Chris Sagers, the James A. Thomas Distinguished Professor of Law at Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, was featured in this week’s New York Times in a weekly legal affairs column by Adam Liptak.  In an entry entitled “Laws Deserve More Than Those Cute Names,” Liptak covered Sagers’ work on the naming of federal statutes, and what evolving trends in statute names say about the growing malaise in our federal Congress.

Sagers’s article, on which the  column is based, is entitled “A Statute by Any Other (Non-Acronomial) Name Might Smell Less Like S.P.A.M., or, The Congress of the United States Grows Increasingly D.U.M.B.”  You can view the paper at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1113026

The Times column appears here:  http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/31/us/colorful-names-for-laws.html?_r=0 .