Kowalski Speaks on Recent U.S. Supreme Court Labor and Employment Decisions, and Argues in the Ohio Supreme Court

Clinical Professor Ken Kowalski

C|M|LAW Clinical Professor Ken Kowalski presented Recent Supreme Court Decisions, Appellate Decisions and Related Topics in Labor and Employment Law at the NLRB Region 8 Labor Law seminar held in Cleveland on May 17th.

In addition, Professor Kowalski argued before the Ohio Supreme Court on June 5th in the case of James A. Lang [et al.] v. Director, Ohio Department of Job and Family Services.  The case involves the denial of certain benefits to three Ohio workers who lost their jobs when their employer transferred its manufacturing operations to Mexico.  A wage subsidy program, Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance, created by Congress for older workers whose jobs are terminated due to national trade policies, is administered by the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services through contract with the federal Department of Labor.  At issue is whether the DOL interpretation of the requirements for participation in the program contravened the statute itself.  When ODJFS sought review in the Ohio Supreme Court, the National Employment Law Project, a national advocacy organization for employment rights of lower-wage workers which had successfully represented the claimants in the lower courts, contacted the Employment Law Clinic for assistance.  C|M|LAW Clinic students researched and helped brief a number of issues of statutory interpretation presented in this litigation, and helped prepare Professor Kowalski for the oral argument.

To view the oral argument before the Ohio Supreme Court, please click here: http://www.ohiochannel.org/medialibrary/Media.aspx?fileId=135921

C|M|LAW Hosts Former Nixon White House Counsel John Dean

White House Counsel John Dean (1973)

As part of C|M|LAW’s enhanced effort to bring issues of ethics and professionalism into the culture of discussion in the law school community, C|M|LAW hosted Former Nixon White House Counsel John Dean for a full day of events on Thursday, April 19.  Mr. Dean began the day by appearing on The Sound of Ideas radio show, with Host Mike McIntyre, at WCPN 90.3 FM.  He appeared on the radio show with C|M|LAW Dean Craig Boise to discuss, in part, the teaching of ethics and professionalism in the law schools.  Mr. Dean met with C|M|LAW students for 1 1/2 hours later that morning to educate them about his experiences, what he learned about ethics and the legacy that Watergate has left us in the form of enhanced rules of legal ethics.  After lunch with a small group of guests and university officials, Mr. Dean held a discussion with the C|M|LAW faculty.  He answered questions about his experiences and the impact they had on his own life and the lives of others.  In the evening, Mr. Dean presented a continuing legal education program with Mr. Jim Robinault (Thompson Hine) in the C|M|LAW Moot Court Room to a crowd of 250-300 people.  At that program, Mr. Dean focused on the events of the first week following the break-in, discussed his testimony before the Senate, and showed video clips of that testimony and other commentary.

John Dean (Today)

Listen to Watergate at 40 on WCPN at http://www.ideastream.org/soi/entry/46411

Talking Foreign Policy, a New Radio on WCPN, to Feature C|M|LAW’s Sterio

Tomorrow evening (Thursday, March 1) at 8:00 p.m., WCPN (90.3 FM) will air the first episode of Talking Foreign Policy.  This new radio will feature a regular group of panelists including C|M|LAW’s Professor Milena Sterio.  The station will air 4 episodes in 2012 at dates and times to be announced.  Topics discussed in the first episode include (1) Predator Drones (2) The International Criminal Court (and the controversy concerning al Bashir, Sief Gadaffi, and the Kenya Six) (3) Responding to Iranian Nukes (including the recent assassinations of Iranian Nuclear scientists).  In addition to Professor Sterio, who is an international law professor, regular panelists include: an ethicist, Shannon French, director of Case Western Reserve’s Inamori Center for Ethics and Excellence; a military expert: Mike Newton, professor of law at Vanderbilt University; and a negotiator: Paul Williams, president of the Public International Law and Policy Group.

For more information about the upcoming series, please see: http://www.ideastream.org/programs/entry/45303

C|M|LAW Hosts Innovative Conference on E-Discovery

On Thursday, November 10, C|M|LAW hosted an innovative half-day conference on E-Discovery, Current E-Discovery Issues from a Practitioner and Judicial Perspective.   C|M|LAW presented and organized the conference in conjunction with the Cleveland-based e-discovery firm JurInnov and the Jones Day law firm.  The conference brought together judges, litigators, corporate counsel and industry experts to discuss the many pressing issues that have emerged in e-discovery practice.  Professor Brian Ray was the driving force behind the conference at C|M, working closely with Mr. Timothy Opsitnick of JurInnov, and Mr. Ted Hiser of Jones Day.

The conference began by convening a practitioner’s roundtable to discuss current and emerging e-discovery issues, then brought in several judges to present the judicial perspective.  Judicial participants included, The Honorable Dan Polster, Judge, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio, The Honorable James R. Knepp, II, Magistrate Judge, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio, and The Honorable Nancy Vecchiarelli, Magistrate Judge, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio.  In addition to co-sponsor JurInnov, industry participants included, representatives from the Cleveland Clinic, Lubrizol, Cooper Tire & Rubber, Squire Sanders & Dempsey, Jones Day, Thorman & Hardin-Levine.  Conference attendees received a tour of C|M|LAW’s new state-of-the-art electronic trial courtroom, complete with demonstrations of the court room’s advanced technology.  Participants were invited to join a new Northern Ohio E-Discovery Roundtable that will convene periodically to continue discussing current trends and best practices in e-discovery.

Wilson and Sterio Speak at Central States Law Schools Conference; Sterio Elected President

Professors Milena Sterio and James Wilson spoke at last week’s Central States Law Schools Association Conference at the University of Toledo College of Law.  Sterio spoke on her work on piracy in Somalia.  Wilson presented his work on three chapters of his upcoming book, The Structure of Class War.

The chapters Wilson discussed are titled, respectively, “The One,” “The Few,” and “The Many.”   The book’s primary technique consists of using the wisdom of the ancient Greeks and The Buddha to demonstrate that most modern conservatives are not very conservative, most liberals not very compassionate, most Republicans not very republican, and most Democrats not very democratic.

Wilson’s three chapters apply the ancient Greeks’ distinction between governments ruled by the one, the few, and the many, to the United States and the global economy.   The chapter on the “One” first compares the symbiotic relationship between the President and the CEOs of major corporations, who are, to use Max Weber’s term, “monocrats.”   The rest of the chapter uses Plato’s political morality to help criticize Professor Posner and Vermeule’s proposal that the President should not be constrained by either “the rule of law” or “separation of powers.”  For example, Plato believed that the best practicable form of government consisted of a wise king who was limited by “the rule of law” created by a public assembly.

The chapter on the “Few” contrasts Plato’s defense of an aristocratic conception of “justice” in The Republic with competing conceptions of “injustice.”   The Republic contains much of continuing value and much to fear.   The next part of the chapter considers Aristotle’s responses, which simultaneously clarifies lingering analytical problems surrounding the “one, the few, and the many” and provides justifications for a republican form of government instead of an aristocratic one.   The final part employs and extends the economic distinction between “predatory” and “productive” modes of wealth accumulation to argue that the political economy of the United States has become increasingly predatory, a precursor to imperial decline.

Professor Sterio spoke on her work on piracy in Somalia.  According to her abstract, the rise of piracy off the coast of Somalia over the last five years has been spectacular, amounting to a true crisis in international law.  During the first six months of 2011, Somali pirates attacked 163 ships and took 361 sailors hostage.  As of June 30, 2011, Somali pirates were holding 20 ships and 420 crew members, demanding millions of dollars in ransom for their release.  Moreover, pirates have been attacking larger ships, such as oil tankers, and using more potent weapons, such as rocket-propelled grenades and automatic weapons.  Pirates have also been attacking during monsoon season, an otherwise risky endeavor.  According to the International Maritime Bureau Director, Pottengal Mukundan, “[i]n the last six months, Somali pirates attacked more vessels than ever before and they’re taking higher risks.”

Sterio concludes that piracy has increased shipping expenses, costing an estimated $10 billion per year in global trade.  She poses and responds to the following questions:  What has sparked this international law crisis off the coast of Somalia?  What can the international community do in order to alleviate the crisis and prevent piracy from spreading to other regions of the world? What should be the way forward?

Professor Sterio, currently Vice President of the CSLSA, was elected President for the upcoming year.  The Central States Law Schools’ Association, is a regional consortium of law schools which has attracted member schools such as Toledo, Akron, Albany Law School, Michigan State, Louisiana State, University of Arkansas-Fayetteville, Texas Tech, Northern Kentucky, SMU, etc.   With Sterio as President, it is likely that C|M|LAW will be the host of next year’s CSLSA annual conference.

For more information about the Central States Law Schools Association, click here: http://cslsa.us.

Litigation and Social Change: Developing Women’s Rights in the Twentieth Century

C|M|LAW Professor Emerita Jane M. Picker returned to CSU on Tuesday, October 18, to speak on Litigation and Social Change: Developing Women’s Rights in the Twentieth Century.  Professor Picker spoke, in particular, about a case she argued in the U.S. Supreme Court in 1973, LaFleur v. Cleveland Board of Education.  Her client, Jo Carol LaFleur (now Jo Carol Nesset-Sale) was present to introduce her.  LaFleur, then a Cleveland school teacher, had been suspended from her job because she was four months pregnant.  Under the applicable maternity leave rules, teachers were barred from Cleveland classrooms starting in their forth month of pregnancy.  LaFleur wanted to remain in the classroom and her baby was not due until July, well after the end of the school year.  Picker took her case, pro bono, all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, and won.  Of course, by then LaFleur’s child was long-since born, and LaFleur herself had gone on to attend law school.  But as a result of this effort the women’s protective laws, like that which had barred LaFleur from the classroom, were overturned not only in the Cleveland schools, but all over the country.

For more information, see Chapter 13 in Peter Irons’ The Courage of Their Convictions- Sixteen Americans Who Fought Their Way to the Supreme Court, at: https://www.law.csuohio.edu/sites/default/files/newsevents/ironscouragechap13.pdf

C|M|LAW Conference on the Politicization of Judicial Elections Draws High Attendance, Press, and Publications

Last week’s C|M|LAW conference on The Politicization of Judicial Elections drew more than 200 participants, and led Professor Susan Becker to be sought out by a Nevada reporter for assistance in understanding a controversial redistricting decision a state judge recently entered there.

The conference was inspired by the November, 2010 elections in which three sitting Iowa Supreme Court justices were ousted from the bench as a result of the court’s unanimous ruling in Varnum v. Brien, 763 N.W.2d 862 (2009). The Varnum decision struck down, on equal protection grounds, a state statute limiting marriage rights to a union between a man and a woman.  The conference examined the effect, if any, the ouster of these judges may have on an judicial independence as well as its effect on future efforts to present state court challenges to laws prohibiting marriage for same-sex couples and to otherwise advance the civil rights for LGBT persons through state court litigation.

More specifically, the conference addressed such issues as the importance of an independent judiciary and whether that independence might be undermined by judicial elections that are highly politicized due to socially contentious issues the court has recently resolved or will resolve in the near future.  In Iowa, for example, that politicization took the form of partisan interest groups funneling resources into the election process to oust justices who voted the “wrong way” by favoring LGBT rights in Varnum.  A similar pattern has emerged in the recent Wisconsin elections where the incumbent justice was almost voted out of office due to opponents’ assumption that this conservative justice would vote to uphold state legislation rendering public employee unions powerless.

Speakers at the conference included Former Iowa Chief Justice Marsha K. Ternus, who spoke on judicial independence and the polarization of the judiciary, and Camilla Taylor, the Lambda attorney who successfully litigated Varnum through the Iowa courts.  Ms. Taylor spoke on the background of the case and her reaction to the election backlash.  In addition, Ohio State Professor Daniel Tokaji, an expert on election law and issues, discussed judicial elections more generally.  C|M|LAW Professors Susan Becker and Matthew Green organized the conference, offered introductory remarks, and moderated the panel discussion.

The Nevada news story, A political judiciary – A Carson City judge’s sortie into politics raises concerns, by Dennis Myers, explains the role of Nevada District Judge Todd Russell in that state’s legislative redistricting.  The Nevada Legislature had enacted redistricting plans for both the Legislature and the state’s U.S. House seats. Those plans were vetoed by Gov. Brian Sandoval, and rather than send the matter back to the legislature for resolution, Judge Russell appointed three ‘special masters’

The article’s author sought out Professor Becker for comment:  “Judge Russell’s creation of an entirely new system of appointing special masters to devise the redistricting plan is creative, and arguably born of necessity,” said Cleveland State University law professor Susan Becker, who has done work on the politicization of the courts. “But a strong argument can be made that the remedy is unconstitutional because it contravenes the unambiguous language of the Nevada constitution’s redistricting provisions.”

You may read the full story at:  http://www.newsreview.com/reno/political-judiciary/content?oid=4186254

The conference video and other supporting materials are available to the public as part of the C|M|LAW Library’s open access research guides at:  https://www.law.csuohio.edu/lawlibrary/guides/sexualorientation#judicialindependence

The Cleveland State Law Review will be publishing the comments and essays submitted by the speakers in its Spring 2012 issue.

Forte Debates ACLU’s Daniel Mach on Shari’a

On Monday, September 27, Professor David Forte debated Mr. Daniel Mach, Director of the American Civil Liberties Union Program on Freedom of Religion and Belief on the topic “Is the Shari’a Coming to America? And Should We Care?”  The Debate was held at the Cornell Club in New York and was sponsored by the New York City Federalist Society Lawyers’ Chapter.

Sterio Speaking at International Law in Crisis Conference

Professor Milena Sterio will be speaking today at the International Law in Crisis Conference at Case Law School.  The conference is designed to examine both the application of international law in times of crisis and whether these events are pushing international law itself to the brink of crisis, with panels examining developments in Northern Africa and the Middle East, climate change, international economic law, universal jurisdiction, piracy, and the war on terrorism.  Professor Sterio will be appearing from 11:15 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.  You can watch the proceedings live at:  http://law.case.edu/centers/cox/webcast.asp?dt=20110909

C|M|LAW Receives Ohio Senate Commendation for the 2010 Diversity Matters Award

The 128th General Assembly of Ohio has honored C|M|LAW with a commendation for receiving the 2010 Diversity Matters Award from the Law School Admissions Council.

Ohio Senate Commendation