
For example, the defendant publishers argued that if they couldn’t protect themselves from unrestrained price competition, and above all from the cut-rate eBook prices being imposed on them by the retailer Amazon, they would be unable to survive. They claimed that price competition would spell the end of the paper book, of bookstores and traditional publishing, and would imperil even the livelihoods of writers and perhaps literature itself. Sagers suggests reasons not only that these arguments were not persuasive, and don’t call for clemency for the eBooks defendants, but that in fact similar arguments have surfaced in all kinds of markets, in all kinds of circumstances, throughout the history of capitalism. In the end, the eBooks case showed not that there are very important special cases calling for exemption from competition, but that competition itself is simply a rough business. If we are to have a competition policy–and we should–we have to make peace with its consequences in times of disruption and change.
OMG! Harvard U. Press! This is incredible!
Kudos Chris, and thank you for representing us so impressively at the national level.
Doron
Doron M. Kalir
Clinical Professor of Law
Director, International LL.M Program
Cleveland-Marshall College of Law
1801 Euclid Ave., LB 138
Cleveland, OH 44115
d.kalir@csuohio.edu
Tel.: (216) 687-3948
Fax: (216) 687-9297
The information contained in this email transmission and any attachments thereto is intended for use by only the addressee(s) and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email and any attachments or other communication of contents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify me at (216) 687-3948 and permanently delete the original copy or printout.
________________________________